Oculus (2014)


Look, let’s make one thing crystal clear, we’re not reinventing the wheel here. A lot of Mike Flanagan’s “Oculus” you’ve more than likely experienced before, in one way or another. And If I’m to be honest, the only reason I watched “Oculus” is because I’m an admirer of director Mike Flanagan’s ultra-low-budget horror flick “Absentia.” A film that caught a bad break when it’s marketing team really misrepresented the film with simple, stereotypical horror posters and publicity. All misdirection aside however, if you haven’t seen “Absentia,” I highly suggest you give it a whirl. It’s a brilliant, atmospheric slow-burn that delivers some seriously unsettling content and chilling scares…but I digress. So, given that “Oculus” appeared to be nothing more than a retread through its awareness campaign and that the film didn’t really provoke much interest from me, except for Flanagan being attached, I didn’t expect much from it going in…


Well, this is the part where I’m supposed to completely shift focus and tell you how exceptional “Oculus” turned out to be and that I loved it! Well, I’m sorry to disappoint you, but I can’t in good conscious lead you on like that. That being said, I can inform you that I was pleasantly surprised with what “Oculus” presented and that it is arguably the second best horror flick I’ve seen so far this year, the chillingly claustrophobic and chaotic “In Fear” still holds the distinction of being number one on my list. Now, taking into account that we’re barely four months into the new year, saying that “Oculus” is one of the year’s best doesn’t exactly hold much weight. With the likes of “Devil’s Due” and the fifth feature in the “Paranormal Activity” series barely making pre-teens have nightmares, even the competition hasn’t been top notch. I really hope this year in horror turns around…but enough about that, back to “Oculus.”



A young woman, Kaylie, tries to exonerate her brother, Tim, who was convicted of murdering their father eleven years ago by proving that the crime was committed by a supernatural force that dwells inside an old mirror.

The film plays out through a series of flashbacks that are recollected by our two protagonists eleven years into the present, who are simultaneously setting in motion a plan to prove the existence of an evil presence living inside the aforementioned mirror, with the intent of destroying it once they’ve obtained their evidence. Additionally, as If that isn’t complicated enough, the possessed mirror continuously distorts reality, making it nearly impossible to predict or conclude what is real and what is fabricated. So right away I became mesmerized by the complexity and hypnotic nature of the story and its many gambits. “Oculus” is a lot smarter than its surface insinuates. However, it does occasionally drift and as flabbergastingly impressive as the film’s editing is, the tale could’ve used sounder structuring. It simply feels a tad too out of control and it is, at some spots, difficult to decipher and follow.


Our evil, devilish antagonist declares, “I’ve met my demons, and they are many. I’ve seen the devil, and I am him.” A chilling, memorable line that won’t soon be forgotten by horror fanboys. Sadly though, it is one of the few things I do recall from “Oculus.” I’m not saying the film isn’t scary, I myself got spooked from time to time, more so during the film’s later half, and I’m not that easily frightened. The most terrifying aspect of the film has got to be these mysterious apparitions, which turn out to be the haunted mirror’s previous victims. They have reflective, glowing eyes that dot the blackness with a sinister demeanour and appear unannounced throughout the film. They really illuminate this overwhelming feeling of hopelessness that radiates from “Oculus.” Nonetheless, overall the film isn’t exactly one you’ll lose sleep over. Yet, the deliciously nauseating apple scene will definitely make your stomach turn.


The only name I recognized attached to “Oculus,” with the exception of director Mike Flanagan, was actress Karen Gillian. Portraying present Kaylie, Gillian gives an inspired performance and really does her best to hold everything together. She’s got the talent and it shows, it is just too apparent that the script let her down. Brenton Thwaites, who tackles the complex role of adult Tim, unfortunately leaves a lot to be desired. Actually, I found it rather perplexing that Garrett Ryan and Annalise Basso, who portray the younger versions of Kaylie and Tim respectively, without question stole the show. I just didn’t expect such investment, terror, and dedication to burst forth from such young actors. Rory Cochrane, whom I immediately recognized having seen his face, does capture the isolated, distant, deteriorating aura of someone possessed, but doesn’t exactly shine blindingly. As for Katie Sackhoff, much like the rest of the cast, is slightly above mediocre.


Providing consistent scares, passable performances, and a script that’s probably too smart for its own good, makes “Oculus” worth the look for die-hard horror fans. However, it’s blatantly open-ended finale which leaves tons of room for countless sequels seems a bit too eager and will undoubtedly turn its fair share of viewers away.

Oculus: 7 out of 10.

About Joseph@thecinemamonster

Aspiring writer who absolutely adores film and television. thecinemamonster.com

Posted on April 17, 2014, in Horror and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 30 Comments.

  1. Nice review, man. I agree with a lot of this, especially about the open-ended finish. Solid horror flick though!

  2. I had a fun time with this. Even if it didn’t always make the most perfect sense every step of the way, I was still interested in seeing where this story would go and what exactly would happen to these characters. You know, like most horror movies should be like. Good review.

  3. Nice work!! I LOVED this movie. I loved the not-so-easy-to-tell what’s real and what time it is editing jobs. Bravo to these guys. And I LOVED young Kaylie!

  4. Victor De Leon

    Excellent work here, my man! As you know by now, I really liked Absentia and I am glad you brought up how they botched the marketing on that one.

    That being said, I think that Flanagan (who appears to be very talented in this genre) had his work cut out for him with this next project and of course we aren’t re-inventing the wheel like you stated. I am very stoked to catch this one, now. I have been reading some mixed to great write up’s out there.

    I am surprised by how, in some circles, the film is divided by genre fans. Much like Ti West’s films, I do enjoy the slow burn that some of these newer directors have been delivering of late. I have a feeling that I will enjoy it on the same level as yourself now that your review clarifies what I should expect. I wonder if the ending is a double edge sword since it’s open for sequels. Thanks! 🙂

    • Absentia is amazing! Can’t believe the disgusting marketing campaign on that one, just pathetic. Flanagan definitely is one of the up-and-coming directors to look out for in the horror genre. With Oculus and Absentia, the future looks bright :). Love Ti West, and yes, this film does feel like it borrows some of his technical aspects, but Flanagan makes it his own. This one’s a little bit of a slow burn, but once it gets going, it’s hard to stop!

  5. Sounds like a weird movie and you are prob right there will be a bunch of sequels for sure.

  6. I like this concept of a mirror that can distort reality, pretty freaky. Good review.

  7. I’m sure you read my review already but I must say that I thought all the acting was exceptional aside form the Father who I think was underscripted. They could have really pushed his character into the stratosphere but I think they were trying to avoid similarities to The Shining.

    • I did read your review :). I agree with you for the most part, I just felt that some of the acting was a bit contrived, for me anyway. Oh well, to each their own! It’d be no fun if we enjoyed all the same movies :).

  8. Very nice review, Joseph. Seems like we feel pretty much the same on this one. Although I didn’t find the ghosts that scary. I guess the eyes were creepy, but…meh. Not bad, but let’s hope horror has room for improvement this year!

  9. I hadn’t heard of this one. Always good to see a strong horror movie. Top work buddy.

  10. Hey Joseph, for some reason I’ve been missing your reviews! That needs to get sorted. Oculus sounds really good actually, I like a horror film that isn’t too hardcore. I almost met Karen Gillan at EIFF last year but circumstances interceded it 😦

    • Hey Mikey! No clue why you’d be missing them, hopefully it’ll work out! Oculus is a pretty decent horror flick that, for the most part, strays away from gore and violence. That’s awesome! Too bad you didn’t meet her, but it’s still a good story :).

  11. I have some interest in seeing this for Karen Gillan but I’m not going to be rushing out to grab it when it comes out on DVD.
    I still haven’t seen ‘In Fear’ – I’m getting the feeling that I am missing something!

  12. Great work Joe.

    Just saw this this past weekend and man I’ve taken awhile trying to wrap my head around it lol. I think the review is ready. But I pretty much agree with you, the script is really weak and plain. . .stupid. . .in spots. In others, I found it quite brilliant. I might score it a tad higher just for the preference I have for it the more I think back on it

  13. Cool review dude

  1. Pingback: SMOKIN’ ACES 2: ASSASSIN’S BALL (2010) TWO TOP HATS | Isaacs Picture Conclusions

  2. Pingback: ROCKY 4 (1985) FOUR TOP HATS | Isaacs Picture Conclusions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: